/int/ - International

>>30643 Try linking it again, I can't find it, you have to use three >

>>30647 ah fug, >>>/m/1571 But I got unbanned quickly, thanks modderinos

>>30648 Ah, I can't even see your post in the thread (only in preview), because I blocked the OP country, those uBlock filters are pure bliss.

>>30605 I think recruitment should happen elsewhere too. Kohl was a no-go for me from the start due to the pedo stuff and generally attracting the worst posters so I had to be told about this place elsewhere. Maybe we need to make our own hot-new memes by capturing a Finnish poster.

>>30661 Recruitment? This is an Internet forum, people will find it if they feel the need for it. There’s no need to advertise it anywhere.

>>30662 That's not how it works anymore, I think.

>>30545 >>30544 Discussions should be fine, there is literally no harm in that and free speech should be able to accomodate this. But for the love of the Buttergott, hammer out every instance of underage pictures, even if its dressed ones. That is the biggest attractor for nonces.

>>30667 I'd happily remove discussions on the topic as well. They do nothing but attract the wrong crowd, even if started in good faith.

>>30662 It'll require advertisement in some form. I'm only here because someone posted a thread on kohl

>>30673 Fair point of view. I'd keep them around because there are preciously view places where people can talk in text about any topic they want and also because there is a bit of a screeching craze going around where people scream "Pedo!" when a 19 year old woman gets courted by a 24 year old guy. But i am also pretty big freedom of speech (as long as its not directly about planning hard criminal activities) advocat and thats a stance that requires quite a bit of extra work from admins/mods to not get out of hand.

>>30674 >It'll require advertisement in some form. True >advertisting on kohl Too many genuinly mentally insane people over there, I'd rather not see here.

Hey, guys, where do I apply for the job of moderator of Krautchan.org?

>>30688 first take that stupid hat off

>>30676 > i am also pretty big freedom of speech So, you're a big freedom of speech? Like you really want to hear the concerns of women, browns, leftists (etc.) in serious discussions?

>>30689 I actually like it, it's unique. It's like I'm different from the rest.

>>30692 Yes, it is important that anyone is able to talk. Nobody is forcing you to listen. I wouldn't listen to a gynobot either, but somebody else might want to and it's not my business to stifle that.

>>30701 Case in point, look at Kohl or reddit for what happens if somebody arbitrarily decides whom shall be able to talk and who shan't.

>>30702 If nobody arbitrarily decides what is spam and what is not, there is also no discussion, just noise. Isn't reddit working fine enough for leftists? Or crystal café for females? Free speech is a code word for spam and destruction.

>>30703 >If nobody arbitrarily decides what is spam and what is not, there is also no discussion, just noise Decisions must be made, but that doesn't mean they shall be made arbitrarily. If you have no coherency in decision making, you end up with some disgusting nepotist cesspool >Isn't reddit working fine enough for leftists Not really, it's a perfect example of skewing to more and more extreme moderation >Free speech is a code word for spam and destruction Wrong You are confusing content with way of delivering That being said, "leftism" is such a retarded category, it throws any pretext about it not being more than "don't post what I don't like" out of the window.

>>30706 >You are confusing content with way of delivering >That being said, "leftism" is such a retarded category, The leftists (you're an anarchist BTW?) don't realize it themselves that they are posting unwanted and stupid spam, they think they are fine and it's the "nazis" who are stupid. It's partly a matter of good intentions, education and critical thinking. Like, let's suppose you're an anarchist pedo, you want to post your shit, others don't want it, and then you post about your way of understanding freespeech, maybe convinced in your heart that you are fighting for freedom, euqality and free-speech, regardless if free-speech, equality and freedom are actually stupid ideas.

>>30711 >You are Maybe a national-liberal with a social (not socialist) streak? >>30711 >you want to post your shit, others don't want it Can be applied to literally anything. I don't want hear about nonces crying they should be allowed to diddle 8 year olds, I don't want to hear about chuds whining about not getting a GF, I don't want to listen to kikes screeching how they are the victim and I sure as hell don't want to listen to the ramblings of feminists. At the same time, there are surely others who don't want to listen about my judeorealism, my interest in castles or general nerd stuff. If you don't want your own free speech denied by arbitrary asspulls ("oooy vey!") this right needs to be universal. And again, content and frequency as well as way of delivery are two different things. If you shit up the board with the same topic three times a day, it's spam, no matter how much I like or dislike the content. And on the same matter, if you make a new thread on a topic that hasn't had a thread in days, it's not spam, even if it's something I think abhorrent like gynocratic ramblings. Same goes for low effort Twittercopypasta threads. It literally doesn't matter whats the content, it's a shit thread. And it's something that's absolutely not restricted to "leftist" posting. Kohl/b was for a while completely full with it until a mod got fed up with that bullshit and started removing it, even though the content was mostly regarding criminal migrants and assorted topics.

>>30713 I replied to some points in the post but I don't think this discussions matters: >If you don't want your own free speech denied by arbitrary asspulls ("oooy vey!") this right needs to be universal. No, they don't. You referring to a theory by Kant which was made to simplify the reasoning about moral rules. It's far from the be-all/end-all of morality, actually it's used as a tool to destroy morality, some examples: -"you want to live in your country in peace, funny because some gypsies also want that" -"males and females can marry, why not the gays and lesbians too?" -"you want to post about religion, better accept the evangelist posting from the old testament" >it's not spam, even if it's something I think abhorrent like gynocratic ramblings. I disagree about this too, spam is not just about frequency, it's the useless shit you don't want, even if it's once a month as a monthly reminder that "women have a lower salary" for isntance. >It literally doesn't matter whats the content, it's a shit thread I also don't like this. I don't use that site. Except I think that it can happen that something posted on that site could be a relevant and good pic to start a discussion.

Administrator! I am discontented! For some reason I was banned for being a Pedo when I am no such thing and I never posted anything that would say that I was nor did I ever advocate for it, in fact I don't even know what post I was banned for and I have appealed but I am still banned. Very sad!!!

Never put .org on https://allchans.org/ .rip did and that’s probably the list the pedo bots use. https://krautchan.rip/ban/350796 https://trashchan.xyz/meta/thread/374.html Try to say clear of any list of Chans. https://imageboards.net/search Seems to be fine at the moment.

Based

>>30715 The thread is available in /m/ if you want to see why I thought you were part of the apologists. I approved your appeal btw. Sorry for the misunderstanding. Non-pedos are welcome here, of course.

>>30725 Okay.

>>30717 wow this makes so much sense! I frequent a few textboards and they regularly get spam posts for advertising CP. they probably just crawl one of these lists, because seceral for old school text boards exist. It's sad because these boards are very slow (like 2 posts a week maybe) and adminds don't check regularly so these trash posts can stay up for hours

>>30667 would be wise to ban the discussion as well for a while, unless you want to patrol the board regularly you can still relax that in the long term

Have you ever smelled wild foxes? Thats even worse.

>>30548 That's the problem with how pedo spammers force people's hands: it will encourage a bunch of american tire retards to play cop to feel powerful but at the same time better that than being flooded with spammers As to what's american tier retardation: 19yo being called pedo for being with a 17yo, adults being treated like babies due to an age gap, etc Just delete threads like those posting instagram pics from minors and any discussion of shit like those famous CP studios, should handle a lot with little effort

>>31599 >force their hand Kinda like kohlcrap huh? Admins were complicit and tried to keep the idea of free speech open to all thought forms until it festered and finally the moderation team was unable to keep the lid on anything. Sure pedos, fags, trannies, furries and other undesirables have always been around in social manners doing their dirty work below the surface and posting on imageboards, they have mostly and rightfully kept in line until pressure from law enforcement came down or from users splintering off or whatever other brigades moving the ideas of acceptable content. I do find it to be a heavy shift in where we are going. As rules have obviously been too relaxed and negative traits are being normalized and in some cases pushed forward too aggressively, we're now seeing a tiresome and pedantic play to reverse these decisions and keep the smoke back in the box. It is simply too late and a great lesson in navigating moderation and social dilemmas.

Is gore allowed here?

>>31673 Oh, just read that gore isn't allowed. What shit site.

>>31599 >>31606 A lot of sites have rules that are too convoluted. You just have to recognise the underlying meaning of a post and moderate according to that rather than X subject is allowed but not Y etc

>>31606 Kohl is a good example, yes. I think it can be compared to something like somalis in Finland: a high trust society only works if you are dealing with people who make that possible. Likewise, a free speech website is only possible with a high quality userbase that won't abuse it (partly because despite any disagreements on minutiae they share certain core values, like not being a porn spamming gooner). You cannot have a serious discussion experience if the somalis of the Internet will shit all over the table. Another example would be the early WASP America that produced the 1st amendment:they could have an environment with free speech precisely because everyone was invested in building a certain type of country instead of being somali tire and shitting all over the place, like this >>31673 nigger It is also why "multicultural" places either descend into anarchy or become tyrannies that try to control it: there is no philia to keep things together naturally so people surrender their freedom for the promise of order over chaos

>>30548 Nah. Pedos need to be stamped out immediately. If you post pedo-adjacent shit like Bougereau paintings of children, "cute" pictures of children, and shit like this, you need to be banned immediately.

>>31746 Such cases when dealing with merkelmen:you have to assume the worst because it's so often the case The good thing is I think if there is enough of a crackdown on it until they learn to leave it might be possible to be more chill later. Basically this >>31681

>>31606 >>31738 The rule that could fix this is easy to understand but hard to implement: You should be free to express yourself regardless of your opinion. But you shouldn't be free to use that expression to shit up the place until only people like you are left. This is why I call pedos ghetto makers. Many groups simply have no reason to abide by the most permissive rules because even those rules are too much for them. They are criminals, they simply have no reason to play by the rules. If you give them any freedom, they'll use that freedom to shit up the place so they can finally have a place for themselves. Ghetto making is real both IRL and online. The reaction to this is usually to curtail people's freedom in the name of some bullshit social order. But that kills the places whose main attraction is freedom of speech: IBs. So, these places either die by ghettofication or gentrification. Incels and racists also behave in this way because that's the only way they can hope to have a place for themselves. It's a very interesting sociological phenomenon to observe on the internet because, unlike IRL, the public and social spaces can be more cheaply and infinitely created, so this phenomenon can be repeatedly observed, closer to a controlled experiment.

>>30544 They use to append .rar files to .jpg files (This was before imageboards supported/allowed .rar files). They would conceal them in images of sinks - "mods are asleep, post sinks" they would say. When I saw that map thread I thought Minor Attracted Person. Best not save any of those map images just in case they have illegal content concealed in them.

>>31738 Kohl is a terrible example of anything except for being a pedo shit hole. If you think it was set up as some sort of "free speech zone" you're deluded or disingenuous

>>31926 None of those kinds of places even have free speech as it is, as in, people get banned for all sorts of stuff they say. It's a flawed concept in the first place really. All there ever is is a list of things you can say and a list of things you can't. If mods allow pedoshit it means the mods want pedoshit and nothing more than that.

>>31751 I never did this sort of thing.

>>31926 You really need to work on your reading comprehension. Are you using a translator or something?

>>32093 Kill youtself

>>32148 based

>>30714 So you basically want to place a bet on always only having mods around that share your exact worldview. Yeah no thanks

>>31674 Good riddance, macaco

>>32093 >>32148 You really have to chill out. That is a funny meme, posting it doesn’t mean you are a pedo