/int/ - International

Pedos are on Roblox and Discord tho.

>>16970 I don’t use those, so I don’t care, why do they shit up our beloved imageboards

>>16969 >why pedos just not use their own imageboards? How would that go? "Hey everybody this is a board for pedos and we who use this board are pedos." I don't think even pedos are so retarded that they would actively make themselves surveillance targets.

>>16973 Boards like this have existed in the past (one example would be cutiegarden or something like that), not saying this is alright btw, but it's better than pestering others with it

>>16973 There's definitely such spaces on the internet, usually for lolicon and gaming mods.

Pedos are mentally ill, that's why you always hear about them getting caught with 7 trillion pictures of CSAM like some deranged crack addicts

They have their own imageboards in tor newtork

Pedos aren't born. They're groomed. And they're grooming themselves. It's like a virus of the mind.

>>17014 Give me a single scientific study that proves this

>>17015 What do you want me to proof exactly? Why don't you show me a study how being a pedo is genetically hard-wired?

>>17014 Pedos are like Homos and other sexual divergences. It also counts for being "normal". Everyone is born with their affinities hardwired to the brain. Well, depending on you childhood this affinities can become bolder. But in the end you will always have such affinities. And here begins the problem. While homos don't hurt anybody if they live their sexual preference, it's different for pedos. They can't. Or actually they shouldn't. Surveys and statistics show, most of them can restrain from doing anything. The actual pedocriminals we see in newspapers are only a very small subset. So I for my part think there should be more possibilities for such people to get help. They cannot be blamed for having this preference or affinity but we can help them to live with it and never getting into criminal grounds.

>>17020 >Why don't you show me a study how being a pedo is genetically hard-wired? Because you made a claim that pedophilia is a caused by society and I'd like some sources for that. I didn't claim anything, so I have nothing to prove.

>>17021 Posting child abuse on KC isn't "getting help"

>>17024 What percentage of people who post CSAM online do you think are pedophiles?

>>17024 I'm not defending posting CSAM. I just think we should focus more on helping these people than blackflagging them.

>>17027 I don't know about posting shit online, but for actually abusing children, there's no clear correlation between attraction and abuse. Most pedophiles don't abuse children. Most child abusers aren't pedophiles. Many abusers were themselves abused as children though.

>>17021 "Born this way" hypothesis is bullshit. The human sexuality is much more malleable than you think. It was good propaganda for gay people to finally get accepted in the mainstream, but it's nonetheless bullshit. From a Foucaultian perspective it's the final stage of medicalization to include an outsider group into the labor market under neoliberalism.

pedos were funny when they were just edgy coomers, but then the LGBTP activists arrived that didn't even care about jerking off. all they did was some weird political activism threads.

I'm sorry, but this constant whining about content on KCs is very algo baby Igor-tier. First you complain that the internet feeds you the same algo-determined crap. Then you get on an ib where users determine the content, and you complain "I'm seeing topics that aren't of personal interest to me". And all you have to do to avoid it is not click on the thumbnail. The 'regular' content is praise Shitler/Holocaust denial, cartel snuff/gore vids, brown bashing, women-bashing/incel shooter praising, etc. And yet through all this, it's the Insta loli that's a bridge too far? Check your moral compass. Yes actual cp is revolting. But so is a beheading video. Don't click on the thumbnail, don't see the shit. Problems solved.

>>17239 Are you a woman?

>>17254 Yes that's right. I'm a woman defending insta loli and other forms of free speech. Good luck with your ESL courses.

>>17259 >Yes that's right. I'm a woman I could tell.

>>17261 <-- The last Itie that tried to think big wound up like this. Maybe let the Northern Europeans do thinking, while you doowop.

>>17263 Okay sweety, let's unpack this. >>17239 >I'm sorry, but this constant whining about content on KCs is very algo baby Igor-tier. <Igor is cringe, you don't want to be cringe like Igor right???? >First you complain that the internet feeds you the same algo-determined crap. <I saw you say that, it's true!!! You did say that!!!!! >Then you get on an ib where users determine the content, and you complain "I'm seeing topics that aren't of personal interest to me". And all you have to do to avoid it is not click on the thumbnail. <Why can't you just be a bit more tolerant??? Just live and let live! >The 'regular' content is praise Shitler/Holocaust denial, cartel snuff/gore vids, brown bashing, women-bashing/incel shooter praising, etc. And yet through all this, it's the Insta loli that's a bridge too far? Check your moral compass. <Woah it's just like that thing that you definitely do! Actually that thing is so much worse! It's appeals to emotion and projection all the way down. >Don't click on the thumbnail, don't see the shit. Problems solved. Or you can go back to kohlshit where your "thinking" is appreciated, that also solves the problem.

>>17265 I love how piñata man triggers some people to this day.

>>17021 >Pedod are like homos They are not. Pedophilia is a fetish not an orientation. It develops just like footfetish or masochism

>>17261 I could smell.

>>17265 I put forward a very basic argument about the value of free expression. You have responded with 2 ad hominems and straw man sarcasm. So you are not in a position to lecture anyone about 'thinking'. To that point, this thread is about content on the kohl, not the kraut. I posted the argument here because kraut is supposed to be the serious board. The only thing kohl in this thread are your responses.

>>17295 Why is everyone insulting everyone else on Twitter as pedos by default I wonder... is that the worst insult they have to offer, or do they want to distract from themselves?

>>17269 I'm not triggered by mama's boy (I've seen the screenshot of his under the table fantasy). I am annoyed I'm getting a kohl-style answer on the kraut.

>>17395 Probably both. Look at how many anti-gay anti-pedo politicians and preachers get caught in the bathroom with little timmy. It's a way of projecting what you hate about yourself onto others.

>why pedos just not use their own imageboards? They don't post this to share. If they want to share stuff they would do it on the darkweb. I think there are two reasons: 1. to annoy non-pedos. It is a unoriginal version of trolling. The main purpose of trolling is to get emotional reactions from other people. In the case of cp they get disgust and outrage from non-pedos. 2. feeling of superiority because they can get illegal stuff. It is like a nigger showing his gun to his gang. He does not want to shoot anybody. He just wants to prove them that he can get illegal shit while they can't.

>>17399 Your analysis is spot on. For other shock and awe subjects, the thread starts with the shock upfront. No one slow walks a thread from a cartel news article to a beheading video. But the cp threads always start soft, with the op and a few others posting. Then after 30m bad onion and a brazil drop non stop cp. It is both trolling and showing off. The point isn't the actual cp, but rather that these posts make them the center of attention.

>>17403 This is one of the many reasons why I don't want to visit Kohl anymore. I don't want to see this shit, either borderline or explicit.

>>17396 I mean the Italian was triggered (and then returned to his primordial kohl instincts). The excessive formatting is clear before reading a single word of what the Italian wrote and I honestly cannot be bothered to read all of it.

They feel oppressed and want to recruit people to their 'cause'. Took all the wrong lessons from the gay rights movement. Also I suppose non-pedo boards are more active so you get the occasional poster who's not already the kind of lost soul that seeks out pedo boards.

>>17030 Foucault was literally gay and died of aids. > "Born this way" hypothesis is bullshit Its dont. It's overrated but it's not bullshit.

>>17295 There probably are real hardwired pedos but they're also probably in the minority. In my experience, many are stuck in some childish emotional stage, which you can easily observe for yourself by taking away their toys (access to cunny).

Some of them are genuinely schizo and or histrionic and feel the need to shove their preferences into everyone else's face, even if clearly not desired. Very much akin to flamboyant drama faggots (as opposed to normal homosexuals). Eg footnik and his mother

>>17415 >Foucault was literally gay and died of aids. So what? Foucault's The History of Sexuality offers a profound explanation how gay acceptance historically has been linked with social stratification, modes of production, and the exercise of (bio)power through the institutional regulation of kinship structures, especially in how it's anchored in the patriarchal structure of the nuclear family. >It's overrated but it's not bullshit. It mostly is. The bio-essentialist framework of sexual orientation hasn't produced anything fruitful and frankly, I believe that even psychoanalysis can offer a better framework of explaining on how non-normative orientations exist. >>17416 Correct. They're also usually very low-empathy and low-IQ. Just to be clear, I'm not talking about people who occasionally fantasize about kids, because then 10-50% of men would be pedos. I'm talking about people who either get caught offending or are very vocal about their pedophilia, e.g. "MAP" activists, footnik. Same goes for the animal fuckers. Being unable to align your Eros with your Tīmḗ is a sign of a completely fucked mind.

>>17441 >The bio-essentialist framework of sexual orientation hasn't produced anything fruitful Might respond to the rest later but we have this framework because people thought they could re-educate gays with therapy and electroshocks and whatnot and the way their homosexuality responded was more akin to something neurological than to something psychological. So now we have this framework telling people "it's neurological, don't bother, and spare them the needless suffering of conversion therapy".

They do have their own imageboard (though its more related to that one soyshit site named the sharty)

IDK but I have my favourite anectode to share about this. It was in the final year of old KC, before Kohl existed, I think it was a few months before it went down for good. Some random attentionwhore from /int/ (IDK who, I deliberately go out of my way to avoid threads and posts about and from these failed existances) told the host of KC that there was pedo shit on KC (mostly /b/ because for some reason the /b/ mods tolerated it) and then KC went down for a few days (or was it a week even?) and we all fled to Ernst. There on Ernst/b/ there was a big, stickied refugee thread for all the Bernds to wait out and see what happens and where IRC logs of what went down were shared. Naturally, the discussion quickly came to why the admin and mods even tolerated pedo shit on their board because it made attacks like these very easy and no one but the pedos want to be affiliated with that garbage anyway. So a vast amount of Bernds blamed the pedos for that outage and you know how they reacted? They were proud of it and said they'd go right back to posting their degenerate porn once the site goes back online. This is the mindset of the pedos. Fake "muh free speech" well poisoning, infiltration, sabotage, parasitism. Like I get having a fetish but why that particular sexual deviancy turns them into bottom of the barrel scumbags that have to boast about their perversion and actively disrupt communities is beyond me. Not even furries are that obnoxious and that's saying something. I wish I had screenshots from that EC sticky because right now this is only a tale but I hope someone was in that thread and remembers the particular posts I'm talking about.

>>17295 What's the difference between fetish and orientation and why the first is developed while second is just is? I thought, both "fetish" and "orientation" are both matters of sexual preferences. Orientation is just something more general "men or women or both", while fetish is something more specific, "which women and how". P.S. Seems like I've replied to you in every thread. Just a coincidence, NOHOMO. >>17473 Switch between ernstchan.xyz and ernstchan.top was also related to this topic, but I don't remember details.

Imageboards are for people who are rejected in conventional normie spaces. Pedophiles also fit into this group.

>I have never understood why pedos just not use their own imageboards? As soon as they have one it dies, they like forms such as anything that ends with “farms”, they have discord and telegram so why do they need an image board. I never click on a link but I know they use shorten links to hide better, idk if there is a place that tells you the next update but I don’t really want to test it too much just in case it auto downloads. It’s important to note that dangerous pedos are Young themselves like 16 grooming 8 year olds and image boards are an old internet thing. The thing in the image is an Image board for 764 people that was very short lived.

There are pedos who are mods of Kohl, right? Thats the only reason I can see.

>>17458 I'm not saying that it wasn't a boon for gay people but there is a difference between being rhetorically compelling and being an accurate description of how shit actually works, especially when it sidesteps a deeper conversation about sexuality, gender and society. Saying that there is a certain genetic expression that makes you crave dick is as much wishful thinking as putting up a dress as a dude and expecting everyone around you to call you "Ma'am".

>>17698 Ironically, bio-essentialism in the form of MAP shit is coming back to bite people (especially the LGBT crowd) in the ass, because why question your porn-induced hunger for cunny, when you can just say that you were born this way.

>>17701 >porn induced Most people I know with actual fetishes (i.e. NOT just a kink but full blown "can't cum without it involved" fetish) had theirs since childhood before even knowing what porn is, myself included. Maybe some people are very moldable by their environment but I've been essentially watching the same porn since I was like 14 yo, the only thing that changed is the resolution got better and the cringey acting from porn studios made way for amateurs. I always wonder what type of person you have to be to see something that doesn't even turn you on and then you suddenly start getting aroused by it. Like you can force me to watch 300 hours of gay pron, wouldn't make me gay. At best it would make me less disgusted due to habituation effect but I wouldn't start fapping to it. maybe vanilla, non-fetish brains work differently but my fetish has been hard coded into me since literal kindergarten age.

>>17715 What do you mean? What strange fetish do you have and can you really not get aroused by anything else? That seems strange.