/int/ - International

Vee haff wayz to make you post.

Mode: Reply [Return] [Go to bottom]

Subject:
Säge:
Comment:
Drawing: x size canvas
Files:
Password: (For post deletion)
  • Allowed file types: GIF, JPG, PNG, WebM, OGG, ZIP and more
  • Maximum number of files per post: 4
  • Maximum file size per post: 100.00 MB
  • Read the rules before you post.

eng Bernd 2025-12-11 13:00:47 No. 30830
>The Holodomor,[a] also known as the Ukrainian famine,[8][9][b] was a massive man-made famine in Soviet Ukraine from 1932 to 1933 that killed millions of Ukrainians. The Holodomor was part of the wider Soviet famine of 1930–1933 which affected the major grain-producing areas of the Soviet Union. >While most scholars are in consensus that the main cause of the famine was largely man-made, it remains in dispute whether the Holodomor was intentional, whether it was directed at Ukrainians, and whether it constitutes a genocide, the point of contention being the absence of attested documents explicitly ordering the starvation of any area in the Soviet Union. Some historians conclude that the famine was deliberately engineered by Joseph Stalin to eliminate a Ukrainian independence movement. Others suggest that the famine was primarily the consequence of rapid Soviet industrialisation and collectivization of agriculture. A middle position is that the initial causes of the famine were an unintentional byproduct of the process of collectivization but once it set in, starvation was selectively weaponized, and the famine was "instrumentalized" and amplified against Ukrainians as a means to punish them for resisting Soviet policies and to suppress their nationalist sentiments. >Ukraine was one of the largest grain-producing states in the USSR and was subject to unreasonably high grain quotas compared to the rest of the USSR in 1930.[10][c] This caused Ukraine to be hit particularly hard by the famine. Early estimates of the death toll by scholars and government officials vary greatly. A joint statement to the United Nations signed by 25 countries in 2003 declared that 7 to 10 million people died.[d] More recent scholarship has estimated a lower range of between 3.5 and 5 million victims.[11] >Public discussion of the famine was banned in the Soviet Union until the glasnost period initiated by Mikhail Gorbachev in the 1980s.[12] Since 2006, the Holodomor has been recognized as a genocide by Ukraine and 33 other UN member states, the European Parliament, and 35 of the 50 states of the United States[13] as a genocide against the Ukrainian people carried out by the Soviet government. In 2008, the Russian State Duma condemned the Soviet regime "that has neglected the lives of people for the achievement of economic and political goals".[14] What does bernd think? I'm not really familiar with it but it sounds like just a consequence of collectivisation like the famines in other commie countries or the Irish famine (something I also don't know much about). The theory that once it happened it was weaponised against the Ukrainians I'm more likely to believe but we are talking about stalin here so I think honestly he just said look the quota is X amount of grain I don't give a fuck how or the consequences but you're giving it khohol. Any Holodomor scholars here?
Would you eat fellow Bernds, if you had to?
I think it's probably impossible to read about this event without some kind of ulterior political motive about whose fault it was.
>>30833 I'm not brainwashed by semitic fairytales so yes
>>30833 No, eating men doesn't sound nice, I would only eat women.
During the late stage of the Thirty Years War, where cannibalism was apparently commonplace in some regions because of the famine caused by the war, a travelling German cleric (Pfarrer Minck) recalls in his journal coming across a farmstead where a woman just ate her husband and kids. The cleric asked if it was tasty and she replied that salt was missing.
>>30846 Would you try human flesh, if it was legal?
>>30846 That woman? Meghan Markle.
>>30851 Can you go back to /pol/? Thanks!
>>30848 Not unless in a very desperate state
>>30853 He's very disappointed in you
>>30852 More celebrity reddit goyslop I think but ok
>>30855 >goyslop Reall, just go back.
>>30857 You're not my dad, guy.
From what I gathered over the years (I have been to both Russia and and Ukraine), the truth most likely goes something like this: - There was a drought, which feudal Ukraine was historically always ill-prepared for - Grain exports paid for the foreign machinery that was desperately needed to advance the Soviet Union - Collectivization took a lot of motivation away from people because prices collapsed and people thought they wouldn't have to work as hard anymore, I remember reading that even Ukrainian historians admitted half the crops were never sown due to this - Disgruntled landowners destroyed a lot of livestock and crops as a resistance to collectivization - When shit predictably hit the fan, aid was dispatched to Ukraine, but channeled along the party hierarchy and mostly handed out to whoever local leaders thought deserved it - Ukraine was so backwards back then, the Soviets faced a decision they couldn't really win: Either hand out food and not industrialize, prolonging the catastrophe, or continue to export food, industrialize as quickly as possible and hopefully use those resources to then quickly resolve the famine So basically the Soviets massively amplified one of the frequent faminess in the region through sheer stupidity and lack of control (e.g. they didn't manage to keep the disgruntles landowners from destroying so much). But at least now we can probably say the decision to not cut back in industrialization was probably right. After the first five-year-plan there already was never another famine in the region, while they had plagued it for centuries before.
It was a mix of nasty things: the wish to terrorize peasants into obedience, the need to find grain to sell abroad, the mismanagement of lower bureaucracy, and in general the atmosphere of terror in the USSR, where those who took grain from peasants, preferred to let the peasants die rather than to be sentenced to death themselves for being too king-hearted to kulaks. At the same time I doubt the terror was directed at Ukrainians particularly. It is more correct to say that they happened to be a big part of the overall death toll. Under other circumstances Russians could easily counter the Ukrainian narrative by officially declaring that famine a bad thing, and erecting a couple of monuments to commemorate the victims of the famine. Instead they destroy such monuments on the occupied territory of Ukraine. Why? Just Russian things…
>>30830 Sounds like Russia did to Ukraine what the UK did to Ireland, maybe with a slightly less capitalistic intent but with more punishment. But I'm not sure how much punishment went into the genocide against the Irish.
>>30878 > I doubt the terror was directed at Ukrainians particularly in part it certainly was meant to famine into obedience Ukrainians as a nation
It also has to be taken into account that the Soviet Union was far from a uniform, organized block back then, that communication was slow and mostly inaccurate, and that even people like Stalin frequently changed their mind because they had little historic precedent to go by and made much up on the spot. There is ample written evidence of Stalin and Molotov critisising the Ukrainian Communist leaders for their failures in preventing and addressing the famines, including a memo from 1932 in which he openly accuses those leaders of downplaying the famine and both Molotov and him start putting pressure on people to deliver aid they had denied. The measures enacted as reactions to the already ongoing famines were also mostly not enforced based on race, nationality or even class, but simply regional. The Soviets had neither the resources to feed everybody nor the power to keep up social order if millions of hungry people started moving uncontrollably into other Soviet territories. So they fenced off the affected areas, dooming some people while protecting others. I don't think there's much proof for a genocide directed at any specific groups. Just cold, hard logic mixed with incompetence in face of a monumental task.
>>30907 >So they fenced off the affected areas, dooming some people while protecting others. So at worst it's a planned genocide, at best it's commie retards accidentally causing a catastrophe and trying to save face. Great.
>>30830 We've been through this.
>>30913 So why still mad af?
>>30878 Apparently Ukrainians in other republics made a large part of the famine numbers there too but once you broke down the rural vs urban Ukrainian death stats the urban Ukrainians didn't have higher numbers of deaths compared to others. So I think while you likely see Ukrainians dying in other regions in higher numbers as an obvious genocide against Ukrainians its more likely that Ukrainians as a people were more likely to be rural farmers so naturally were the most affected in every region where famines took place since it was low harvests being taken to the urban areas which was the cause of starvation.
>What does bernd think? I think you should keep quiet before the Irish start demanding reparations.
>>30986 potato famine wasn't man made, most criticism is what could have been done better or not being taken seriously enough UK gave ireland independence, while russia launched a devastating war and kidnapped 30,000 children that has killed more people than the potato famine. i think we can all objectively say their is a bias to overly scrutinize everything bad the UK did because it was colonial power, but borderline cover up humanitarian achievements like ending Atlantic slave trade or ending the black plague in india with extremely minimal deaths also Russia owes Ukraine reparations in over a trillion for its genocide, war, war crimes, and other heinous deeds

Open file 23.78 KB, 954x539
Pfostenbild
>>30998 >russia launched a devastating war and kidnapped 30,000 children that has killed more people than the potato famine Lol, u ok, schizo?
>>31026 Ah yes, the others are schizo.

Open file 430.15 KB, 500x361
Pfostenbild
>>30998 >potato famine wasn't man made
>What does bernd think? It's about as real as the holocaust
>>31071 Yes, both are historical facts.