/int/ - International

Biolabs is my favorite cope.

>>31874 Oh yeah, I forgot about those!

>>31880 I think poccnr ziggers are easy to understand if you pretend they are 6 years old. >who ate all the nutella? <uhh it was a thief! he came in through the window and ate it all, I swear! and then he smeared my mouth and hands with what was left!

>>31874 Yawn.

I remember in 2022 when I spoke with a Kazakh in Israel who worked as a supermarket shelf refiller, and he went on a long rant out of nowhere about NATO, and how Russia invaded Ukraine out of necessity.

>>31915 Lmao, it's unbelievable that it has been almost 4 years ago, we really live in clown world.

>>31916 >almost 4 years ago 2022 wasn't-- Fug.

>>31915 He's right.

>>31933 You are wrong. There was no need for Russia to invade Ukraine. It backfired hard for Pootin anyway, also lol.

>>31941 Prior to 2022 the Kievan regime began to talk about NATO membership, reconquest of Donbass and even reobtaining nuclear weapons. Russia absolutely had its reasons to act upon it. Minsk II was literally admitted to be a western sham, so I don't know why are you still playing this pretend game.

>>31944 What’s wrong about them joining a defense pact? And what’s wrong with taking control of their internationally recognised borders? It’s what any country would do.

>>31944 >Kievan regime

>>31944 Some of the pocnner bots are still on it seems.

>>31933 Dude is a brain washed post Soviet mind raped Stockholm victim, he defends the narrative and pov of a society that spat him and doesn't want him, this evil shitty decaying empire that only sells oil and gas.

>>31944 And which one of your tears gave pootin the right to invade Ukraine? He is making a fool of ruzzia.

>>31958 You sound familiar, are you the same clown that tried to claim Tarkovskiy was a copycat? Oy vey! Oy gevalt!

>>32004 How does attacking random Bernds on /int/ help your holy pootin with his three day special military operation?

>>31944 >>31902 >>32004 How did an unironic Waldermar find his way here?

Oh yah

>>32010 KC alternatives are being actively discussed on kohl, since pedos are running rampant again there.

>>32010 I'm more interested in the question of how did these 3.5 nafotroons land here.

>>31950 Running on some boomers unpatched Win XP judging by the laziness and predictability of its comments.

I also remember flight controller Carlos. Russians have the worst made-up excuses. They're not even trying to convince anyone.

>>32016 Yeah. What's crazier is that they succeed anyway XDDD some people really are that stupid

>>31873 Remember when they thought "Germans will freeze to death this Winter without Russian gas!" in like 2023 or so?

>>32012 But this is a pedo and Waldemar free zone.

>>32018 Friendly reminder that Robert Habeck (Greens) did a great job on this.

>>32020 Is it?

>>32022 I mean, it used to be. The Waldemar ITT technically proves me wrong.

>>32023 He's been around under various proxies from the start I think. I don't mind, prevents this place from becoming an echo chamber. Although he's unnecessarily rude sometimes.

>>32027 >proxies The nafotroon lore is as fascinating as always.

>>32027 It's not a proxy, this is Rainer Winkler aka "Drachenlord"

>>32028 You used to have a germball.

>>32024 funny pic

>>31874 I'll never get tired of this picture.

>>32027 >echo chamber Yeah, we don't want that. However, Russian shills aren't really promoting serious discussions. They just engage in shit-flinging and try to derail everything. But having only one around is tolerable, I guess. A lolcow is needed from time to time.

>>32031 Ask the mods, I have no idea why it switched to Bavaria, nor do I care.

>>32034 Russian propagandist might be a fun job. Building the Ukronazi biolab for a picture is some real theater kid shit. The "Apple Computer" is a fun detail. Non-apple screen, non-apple silver mouse and then the operator has his hand in the mouse moving position, but not on the mouse, like a buggy video game character. The Ukraine trident, biohazard, USA-flag picture on the wall takes the cake, though.

>>32035 >They just engage in shit-flinging and try to derail everything. >A lolcow is needed from time to time. The nafotroon ability to project, and all while in their own puddle of shitposting at that, is truly fascinating.

>>32014 >Noooo! Uuuu! Classic Waldemar. Or even worse: just a stupid troll pretender. zOMG

>>32018 It was very funny on /fefe/, the local schizo there still believes, that the German Michels froze.

>>32018 Did Germany get propaganda too?

>>32039 oh hi. I wonder how long you'll last on a place where you aren't a mod pet

>>32018 I actually got banned on kohl once for arguing the opposite :DD

for fucks sake will you bring that shitshow here as well?

Good thread

>>32060 I think it's actually good idea to have a "taboo" thread like this now and then, just because it is apparently 100% irresistible for certain Kohlers to show their true colors. Also it would be kinda refreshing to talk about a big elephant in the room (fucking war in Ukraine) without shizos trying to disrupt. I mean, should we not talk about major history taking place in Europe currently just because some Waldemars over on Kohl can't discuss it properly? IDK, I don't want to feel like being intimidated by shills like >>31944 and just avoid the topic altogether because of that.

>>32027 >prevents this place from becoming an echo chamber You need rooster military propaganda to prevent what?

>>32069 I would kinda like a Ukraine thread without Waldis, gypsies or dilation-obsessed proxies. But the server would have to be on neutral ground (USA or SE asia or something like that).

>>32080 What does the server location have to do with it?

>>32082 Certain viewpoints can't be represented if you host in one of the conflict parties. Wartime laws apply.

>>32060 >>32069 I think having a general thread for it is preferable in these situations to avoid it derailing other threads unless it becomes relevant to that discussion e.g. Natasha's in the west. >>32083 Wartime laws?

>>32103 Pointing out locations of military installations. Blogging from the front. Both of these would be spicy.

>>32069 >I mean, should we not talk about major history taking place in Europe currently There are literally powerful people trying to prevent us from doing so, yes.

>>32103 that's like saying we need a pedo general for 'containment' what actually happened, and this is the reality, more people came to that site just to shill for russia, and when the general was too slow they just want to other threads to insult ukrainians, NATO, whatever. even infiltrated the mods and ban people for saying waldi

>>32069 >it is apparently 100% irresistible for certain Kohlers to show their true colors Like I said, it's ironic that nafotroons have the nerve to project like this in a literal puddle of their own shithosting. I'm not the one making political threads here, clown. Nafotroons are the ones that can't hold themselves from being globalist and gay apologists on a board that is supposedly intended as free of politics.

>>32080 >I would kinda like a Ukraine thread without Waldis, gypsies or dilation-obsessed proxies. Sounds like an echochamber similar to r/europe is exactly a place for you, not any imageboard. Why won't you fuck off there and let this place be politics-free?

>>32103 >I think having a general thread for it is preferable There's a general on kohl specifically for you. No, I think that either nafotroons should be banned for shitposting threads like these, or this place should at least try to be like the actual old KC, where the Bernds were by no means apologetic of the globalism.

>>32217 either you don't lurk the thread, then you don't know that those are by far the worst spammers of the thread, or you do lurk it, then you're being disingenuous

>>32233 If a thread is being allowed, I will react to it. But I would much prefer this place being EITHER politics free like the mods claim they want it to be, OR like the old KC where nobody gave a fuck if a couple threads were about politics. Of course, they are incapable of providing that, considering that this place, being hosted in the fucking Ukraine of all places, has to abide by their ridiculous rules.

>>32243 Or maybe you put a tampon in it and you stop being such a butthurt, obnoxious faggot. I would much rather be able to discuss certain things among adults than have le banned topics because some people can't stop sperging out.

>>32264 Talking about the obnoxious faggots as you propagate, unsaged, the subhuman globalist agenda. Are you enjoying your sunhuman french order of things? The fact that you submit to globalism? You filth, you know perfectly well how you betrayed the second republic, you subhuman addicted whore. I would spit at your face if I was near you, but I'm afraid that you'd like it. Fucking scum.

>>32266 >Talking about the obnoxious faggots as you propagate, unsaged, the subhuman globalist agenda. You see, that's exactly what I'm talking about. Your attitude is like "noooo, you CAN'T have a different opinion than mine, I MUST fight you over it and shit up the place". That leaves moderation two choices, either allow you to shit up the place or ban the topic entirely because retards like you can't allow dissenting opinions. I say we shouldn't allow idiots to drag the place down to their level of maturity (4-6 years old) and either you stop being a cunt and discuss in a normal manner, you go back to your shithole both online and IRL or you periodically get banned. Fuck, they even banned the gypsy zigger on the other place because he argued non-stop the way you do.

>>32269 If you compare /b/ with the other place's /b/, then this one is super comfy because they don't tolerate /pol/ stuff here. But with enough non-retarded posters, you can simply ignore the bavariaball and have comfy discussions. I know the temptation of replying to an aggressive faggot like him, but for a while it can work. Maybe it's just wishful thinking though, since /pol/ cancer and gooners killed kohl and 4chan. Do you think that /int/ should ban (identity) politics the way /b/ does here?

>>32270 You can't ban politics entirely because /int/ means also global events, and global events also means politics. Or I mean, you could, but end up with a seriously castrated version of /int/. As I said, I'd rather have the ability to discuss things and be banned if I step over the line than have taboo topics.

I will hate roosters forever and ever for bringing their nigger issues to my imageboards. Simple as.

>>32272 The way politics is banned on /b/ is that everything "Ronny vs Sören" or "rightoid idiot vs. leftoid idiot" will get moved to /rvss/. That's kind of identity politics only, but it seems to cover almost all of politics. I guess they could find a line here where serious discussion about politics is allowed, but screaming "my group is better than your group" will get you removed.

>>32276 >but screaming "my group is better than your group" will get you removed. Yeah, I like that. If one can't be autistic and somewhat detached discussing such things then perhaps he should go back to the other place and have his pvp fights all day long.

>>32278 But to be fair, I don't see nearly as much idpol ragebait on /int/ as what got removed to /rvss/. Maybe the audience here is naturally more autistic and less /pol/ retarded.

>>32279 The board just didn't have a big influx yet. On the Kohl it only really started to get bothersome when 4chan did some /pol/ purges and they looked for another place, same with pedo refuggers from 8chan.

>>32018 Brent today got below $60 the first time since the war started will we get $20 soon?

So... Russia lost another submarine.

>>32243 > baww baww I don't like the politics of this place so ban politics threads completely this is what you sound like

Just ban roosters and their bots lol Problem solved.

>>32243 >>32266 Wah wah >>32295 This It's an obvious Waldinigger, trying to stifle anything against his talking points