/int/ - International

Vee haff wayz to make you post.

Eintragsmodus: Antworten [Zurück] [Gehe nach unten]

Betreff:
Säge:
Kommentar:
Zeichnung: x Zeichenfläche
Dateien:
Passwort: (Kommentarlöschung)
  • Erlaubte Dateitypen: GIF, JPG, PNG, NetzM, OGG, ZIP und mehr
  • Maximale Anzahl von Dateien pro Post: 4
  • Maximale Dateigröße pro Post: 100.00 MB
  • Lies die Regeln bevor du postest.

it Bernd 2025-09-08 18:21:31 Nr. 9437
Good news everyone! Apparently, causality might not be a thing. This is yet more evidence that points to the universe not being material at all in its essence. Based?
What the fuck happened to her accent, the last time I bothered paying any attention to her she had a normal German-speaking-english accent but now it sounds like some half-Australian monstrosity. Advanced mental illness.
I don’t need scientific evidence to realize that matter is not the heart of the universe. But this would be hard to explain to people who believe in materialism, it’s like a revelation. Of course, there are ways to come to that conclusion in a rational way, like philosophy or what you posted. It’s just important what we make of it, to live in accordance with the soul.
>because I don't know what happened it means causality doesn't exist What is this retardation?
I refuse to listen to any physicist who believes in Eternalism
I see that German attention whore, I säge.
In the 1700s David Hume already showed that you can't rationally or logically prove causality. You can only say "in all the instances we've seen so far, B has always followed A" but there's no rule in the universe that says this must be so, it's only what we've observed so far. Nothing you point to in a causal chain is absolute proof that B must follow A. Perhaps it'll be different tomorrow.
>>9451 Almost nothing can be proven absolutely We still have reason to have very high confidence that causality is real
>>9458 I'm a physicist and all she does is ragebait. She superficially delves into a topic and then makes a ragebait video. Bernd only truly realised after she made a video about a paper he worked on. It's just YouTube content, designed to be fast, cheap and keep engagement high.
>>9463 Ahh. She's not rage baiting she just has strong personal views about the way the physicist community works.
>>9467 But her understanding of physics outside of her field is mid at best, so why should anyone watch a video with strong opinions and weak points? Maybe engagement baiting fits better than rage baiting.
>>9467 Same goes for Dr. Axel Stoll. He has amazing knowledge about free energy, scalar waves and other hidden nazi technologies. He is a well known german expert on physics.
>>9468 I don't actually watch her Physics stuff that much, I mostly watch her videos on other topics which I think are quite good. >>9470 Not strong views in that way, in fact she is more the opposite. She's quite skeptical.
>>9471 If she makes videos about 20 topics, I'm an expert in one and that video is bad, I can only assume that all 20 are bad, but I'm not enough of an expert to see it in the other 19 cases.
>>9474 I disagree that her videos on Physics are bad persay, she is just skeptical and dismissive of much of the research being done and of course as you are in that feild you are going to react negatively to that. Having said that. Yes, she is commenting on many fields she is not an expert in, but that's Youtube in general. Most Youtubers don't have any relevant expertise at all, at least she is a scientist. So I think overall she does a good job as a science communicator.
>>9458 I half-recalled seeing something from her that made me think she had fallen to overprideful contrarian clickbait retardation, but looking at her shit for a second now I dunno. Accent is weird though.
Watched this breddy intresting video that touches upon how materialism is fundamentally a lie that we keep believing for convenience's sake so here it is. :^)
>>9474 do you believe in the eternalist model of time